‘Freedom Convoy’ lawyer sued over Nazi flag assert

&#13
A lawyer who represented “Freedom Convoy” organizers in the course of the community inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act is being sued for defamation by a Toronto advisor he proposed carried a Nazi flag to the protests in Ottawa on Jan. 29.

&#13
Brian Fox and governing administration relations business Enterprise Canada submitted a statement of assert in opposition to Calgary attorney Brendan Miller on Wednesday, contacting the allegation “malicious” and “character assassination with no foundation and without having regard for the influence of his words.”

&#13
The lawsuit alleges Miller falsely recommended Fox condoned detest associated with the Nazi flag and had engaged in a conspiracy with the Liberal federal government to discredit the protesters.

&#13
During the Community Purchase Unexpected emergency Commission, Miller suggested to witness David Vigneault, director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Services, that Fox was the human being photographed carrying a flag with a swastika.

&#13
Vigneault denied any understanding of the claim.

&#13
Miller’s allegations at the hearing echoed a conspiracy concept circulating among the convoy supporters on social media, based on partially obscured images of a gentleman carrying the flag.

&#13
The declare drew an immediate response from Organization Canada, a Toronto-based company where by Fox serves as a communications and crisis reaction marketing consultant.

&#13
The business termed the allegation “absurd” and “despicable” and mentioned Fox was not even in Ottawa at the time. Even further, the agency stated Fox was a Conservative and experienced supported Pierre Poilievre in the leadership race.

&#13
In the statement of assert, filed in the Ontario Excellent Courtroom of Justice, Fox and Company allege: “These assertions are patently bogus. Mr. Fox has not been in Ottawa considering the fact that 2019 when he attended the Manning conservative motion meeting. Neither Organization nor Mr. Fox ended up in any way associated, either for or towards, the Independence Convoy protests.”

&#13
The defamation motion seeks a overall of $2 million in damages towards Miller and requires he publicly retract and apologize for the allegations.

&#13
None of the allegations in the lawsuit have been proven in court docket and Miller has not but submitted a defence versus them. He did not answer to a ask for for remark Wednesday.

&#13
Miller had also filed an software at the listening to to get in touch with Fox as a witness, stating there was evidence, “the flags, and purported protestors working with them, ended up not protestors with the convoy at all, but provocateurs.”

&#13
The application was supported by an affidavit from protester Shawn Folkes, who claimed he experienced spoken to the gentleman holding a Nazi flag on Jan. 29.

&#13
“I went on to the web site for Company Canada and discovered Brian Fox’s profile thereon, together with a photo of him,” Folkes mentioned in the affidavit.

&#13
“I can validate that Brian Fox is the person I met with the Nazi Flag on January 29th.”

&#13
But the lawsuit submitted by Fox and Organization claims even Folkes questioned Miller’s charge, indicating in a social media article, “I hope Miller is aware what he’s executing mainly because he’s gotta have something. How did he get this name?”

&#13
Miller also alleged that the photographer who took photographs of a male carrying a Confederate flag was the prime minister’s photographer.

&#13
In simple fact, the pictures had been taken by longtime Parliament Hill photojournalist Dave Chan, who did get the job done as formal photographer for then-key minister Paul Martin in 2004 and 2006.

&#13
For the duration of the inquiry, Miller was also involved in a weird incident outdoors the hearing area, the place he appeared to have mistaken Ottawa lobbyist Greg MacEachern for Fox and invited him to testify at the hearing. He acknowledged to reporters afterward that he experienced created a miscalculation and claimed, “Apparently, you will find a great deal of individuals out there that glimpse like Mr. Fox.”

&#13
Attorneys are usually safeguarded from defamation motion for factors they say in lawful proceedings. However, the lawsuit statements Miller “went far outside of the function of counsel, elaborating on, repeating, justifying and amplifying the phony assertions from the Plaintiffs outside the Commission hearing, to many media, on social media and to everyone who would pay attention.”